The technology behind 3D printing came into existence at the perfect moment, just in time to satisfy the requirements of agility at both the strategic and operational levels. In the long run, AM has the potential to become a game-changing technology that can maximize the use of multi-domain integration, resulting in huge flexibility. This is because it can maximize the use of multiple domains simultaneously. It is time to face the facts: the defense challenges of the 21st century cannot be solved by a single solution. Instead, we must rely on agility to provide multiple responses in order to meet these challenges. We prepare or place 3D printing equipment and materials in various strategic locations, including land, sea, and space, to form the ability to produce parts on demand, thereby shortening the manufacturing cycle of the two stages of design and assembly. These preparations and placements allow us to produce parts on demand, which in turn shortens the overall manufacturing cycle.

It is possible that in the future, basic logistics operations will frequently be redirected to supply outposts with components that can be directly processed locally. This will not only save time and money, but it will also satisfy urgent needs. A scenario like this one is described in the document titled "Air Force Future Combat Concepts," which envisions a future in which a container of polymer materials will be air-dropped, and isolated outposts will directly print the parts using 3D printing technology. When the airdrop was eventually successfully delivered, the documentation to print the necessary parts was sent over a secure space link. As a result, the printer was able to produce the essential parts in a matter of hours rather than days, thereby saving millions of dollars in the process.

Make use of additive manufacturing (AM) technology to print replacement parts according to the needs of the field, which will cut down on unnecessary part purchases and part inventory. However, in order to successfully implement and manage this new process that was incorporated into supply base maintenance operations, a learning process was required. For instance, the process of replacing engine parts currently entails purchasing, sending to the site, registering and warehousing, and picking up on demand. All of these steps take place simultaneously. In the future, however, these spare parts will be able to be printed directly in the field or at zinc alloy die casting factory the maintenance and overhaul site as needed, thereby doing away with the requirement to pre-set a variety of spare parts.

We are able to envision that the application of AM technology in the real world will result in a procurement process that is extremely streamlined in the future. We can also envision that purchased 3D printers, raw materials, and technical documents will be delivered directly to the battlefield, where they will be used to print tanks and other types of systems. In the event that this method is successful, it may completely change how quickly acquisitions are made. In the process of developing new systems, it is essential that we keep in mind that our enemies are also advancing technologically and making efforts to undermine our tools. As a result, we must incorporate the identification of potential new dangers and the formulation of responses to them into the design phase of our projects.

It is important to point out that the process of developing a system needs to have a close connection to the discoveries made during the early stages of development. This is because, in the absence of knowledge gained in connection with fundamental research, it is possible that some opportunities for the incorporation of technology will be lost. On the other hand, if we are aware of the degree to which certain associated technologies have progressed, we will have the confidence to plan ahead, include regular technology updates in our acquisition plan, and timely incorporate those technologies that are still in the process of being developed. According to the lessons that have been learned up until this point, it is necessary for the United States government to keep technological control and ownership of relevant interface technologies.

The generation of three-dimensional structures from printable parts is still primarily accomplished through the addition of materials one layer at a time. However, brand new applications and fields of technology are constantly being developed. In the future of additive manufacturing technology, there will most likely be a large number of players offering a variety of application choices. These players will range from large corporations that offer high-volume industrial printers to small start-ups that specialize in a specific application. Statasi and 3D Systems, two of the most well-known names in the industry of extrusion and selective laser sintering printers, joined forces with Hewlett-Packard's new computer-aided printing technology and Carbon 3D's continuous liquid interface in 2016. competition in the field of production technology.

The printing time required by these new technologies is anywhere from ten to one hundred times faster than that required by the printers that are currently in use, and the surface finish is also improved. In addition, the starting materials have an important part to play in the enhancement of the product's quality as a whole. Plastic filaments made of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and polylactic acid (PLA) are still widely used in many printers; however, the variety of materials that can be used in 3D printing is steadily growing. This includes specially designed composites, glass, ceramics, and conductive inks. The proliferation of additive manufacturing (AM) technology has been helped along by the intensified competition among newly emerging printer companies and material suppliers; however, the cost of materials will continue to be a concern as the technology becomes more widely used.

There are already companies in China, Italy, and the United aluminum casting factory States that are making low-cost modular buildings that use 3D printing. 3D printed structures are becoming increasingly large. A comparison has been made between the adjustable buildings that make up this massive structure and the pyramids that date back a thousand years; not only are they majestic in scale, but they also contain intricate internal passageways. Even though the scale of these structures is impressive, additive manufacturing will not be able to become a revolutionary technology that changes the game until it is possible to improve the functionality of basic building block materials and printer configurations. Eventually, this improvement will hopefully lead to the most revolutionary military applications. Earlier research has shown that selecting sensors and placing them into printed structures to achieve functional embedding is a step toward more advanced 3D printed devices. This step was demonstrated by selecting sensors and placing them into printed structures.

Materials that enable thermal and electrical conductivity in electronics (such as traces, solders, and other similar materials) are rapidly evolving as a result of taking advantage of the one-of-a-kind properties of nanoscale components (such as silver and carbon nanotubes). Shear-thinning inks have been developed as a result of developments in formulation, and these inks are now suitable for use in 3D printers that are commercially available and use oil-filled cartridges, as well as multi-head, multi-material printing printers that have been retrofitted from commercial printers. These are significant steps toward the development of functional products, which are manufactured by stacking multiple types of materials in a single system.